![]() Looking at the survey results, it appears that many Americans conflate the primary benefit of recycling - less pollution and waste - with the potential to meaningfully address a very different problem: climate change. And they overestimate the amount of emissions avoided by using energy-efficient appliances and recycling. The Times Opinion/Ipsos survey found that Americans tend to underestimate the effects of actions that are harder to take, like avoiding air travel or adopting a vegan diet. If you got a few of the answers wrong, you’re in good company. Results for Americans who correctly guessed “small effect” also include those who thought the action might have no effect. Sources: Survey by Ipsos small, moderate and large effect categorizations by Times Opinion, based on estimates from “Quantifying the potential for climate change mitigation of consumption options” by Diana Ivanova, John Barrett, Dominik Wiedenhofer, Biljana Macura, Max Callaghan and Felix Creutzig Note: Responses were weighted to be nationally representative. Take the quiz below to see how you stack up. To demonstrate how far we have to go, I worked with Times Opinion and Ipsos to test about 1,000 Americans’ ability to size up various ways to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. ![]() During that time, I’ve found that while the public’s understanding that climate change is happening has increased, practical knowledge about what we can do to counter it is lacking. I’ve been studying how people think and feel about climate change for over a decade. ![]() The number of options can feel overwhelming, and there’s another problem: Researchers have found that people often adopt habits that may seem significant but actually have a very small effect on limiting climate change. Lists of ways to reduce your personal greenhouse gas emissions are plentiful online, with recommendations ranging from using energy-saving light bulbs to not having children. This fall, climate activists captured the public’s attention after they threw soup at one of Van Gogh’s sunflowers paintings and glued themselves to Johannes Vermeer’s ‘‘Girl With a Pearl Earring.” While the activists’ stunts prompted a debate about the effectiveness of radical tactics for systemic change, the spectacles may have left some wondering just what exactly they should be doing at home. ![]() He previously served as editor in chief of the Journal of Environmental Psychology. discuss some of the science concepts that underlie the carbon cycle.Sander van der Linden is a professor of psychology at the University of Cambridge.use inference skills to answer some of the quiz questions.use reading literacy skills to locate information and answer the quiz questions.use scientific literacy skills to read and interpret features of the carbon cycle diagram.The quiz combines scientific literacy with reading literacy and provides students with an opportunity to practise the science capability ‘Interpreting representations’.Īlternatively, the quiz can be used as an introductory tool to gauge students’ prior knowledge or as a summative assessment.īy the end of this activity, students should be able to: In this activity, students use the interactive carbon cycle diagram to explore the global carbon cycle and to answer questions in an online or paper-based quiz. The carbon cycle is a visualisation of the processes that move and store carbon between living and non-living things. Carbon moves through the Earth’s system in many different ways.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |